BL-A-005: Chronology

BIJECTIVE LABS


BIJECTIVE LABS . SEP 7, 2026


BL-A-005: Chronology

Status: RELEASED

Classification: PUBLIC

Revision: 1

Date: 2026-09-07

The whole programme on one timeline, 2026-05-04 to 2026-09-07.


1. The shape of it

PeriodDaysWhat happened
05-04 to 05-2320Origin: retail architecture purged, migration to a microstructure system
05-24 to 05-307The maker era. Three variants, 28,119 shadow trades, class closed
05-30 to 06-1214Taker with a wider edge. Phase gating introduced
06-071The measurement error found
06-12 to 07-0221Five parallel machines. The apparatus built
07-02 to 07-1817The second venue. Eleven hypotheses resolved
07-241State evaluation across both venues
07-26 to 08-039Programme II. Six doors, eight hypotheses, one sealed gate
08-031The anchor audit

Roughly 90 working days from first commit to closing audit.


2. May

DateEventProduced
05-04First commit on the microstructure system
05-10Comprehensive system auditTen critical defects closed
05-16Optimisation pass, latency and alpha quality
05-23External architecture critique, answered point by pointA scored self-assessment against institutional practice
05-24Breakeven win rate measured at 122.2 percentPivot to passive execution. BL-IN-001
05-24Position tracking defect, 308.76 USD unhedgedSigned net position tracking
05-26Exposure 84 times the declared limit after eight hoursRisk state bootstraps from the venue, not local memory
05-27Four of eight declared instruments not streamingUniverse constitutional gate
05-28823 triggers, zero fillsPivot to taker entry
05-29Three shadow variants launched in parallelThe parallel portfolio pattern
05-30All maker strategies halted after 28,119 tradesPhase-gated roadmap with hard criteria
05-30Empirical gate passed on 4,800 screened cells
05-3126 hours of shadow produced five tradesRolling universe

3. June

DateEventProduced
06-01Integrity manifest before infrastructure transfer
06-02995 trades at -1.97 bps; one signal carried the whole loss
06-07Every verdict to date was computed grossR-01. BL-IN-002
06-12Research and live container separation designed
06-14Three hypotheses on unused streaming data, all rejected
06-15Evaluation standard pre-registeredBL-D-004
06-17Open-interest depth assumption caught before implementationR-22
06-22Rejection verdict retracted; 87 percent of sample was one instrumentR-19. BL-IN-004
06-22Canonical data substrate manifestMeasure, do not assume
06-23Universe registry with denylist and liquidity floor
06-25Cointegration retired; walk-forward turned +180 into -55 to -68Walk-forward harness made mandatory. BL-IN-003
06-27Cash and carry retired; 13 of 14 instruments unexecutableFirst venue-access verdict
06-28Latency profile published as a sizing referenceBL-EC-002

4. July, first venue

DateEventProduced
07-01Unbounded event list exhausted memory; 38 hours downBounded sinks, class K6
07-02Five strategy designs and a verification runbook for the second venue
07-03Premium characterisation passed; cohort persistence failed
07-05Multi-confirmation doctrine, nine rulesBL-D-007
07-05Independent audit of prior venue workCoverage below gate; an acceptance instrument found invalid
07-06Data integrity protocol: 11 incidents, 6 classes, 8 rulesBL-D-006
07-09Gate orthogonality measured; three of four gates redundantSpecification reduced before any return computed
07-10Cascade reversion falsified; recovery fraction negativeContinuation, not reversion
07-10Adverse selection by identity confirmed at 0.906 bpsA fact, not a strategy
07-10Selective quoting falsified; every arm gross negative
07-10Momentum follow falsified; gross negative before any fee
07-14Identity bursts: signal real at +3.04, net -5.96BL-SD-029
07-14Whale drift closed on cadence
07-14Passive post-exhaustion reversion: event-limited, not falsifiedStill open
07-14Fill matcher found undercounting 55.7 percent of adverse fillsVerdicts re-run and upheld with worse numbers
07-16Deprecated feed found; blind for more than nine daysR-18. BL-IN-005
07-17Three timing levers measured and closed
07-18Cascade premise underpowered and coverage-limitedRecorder design named as the constraint
07-24State evaluation: 20 of 22 families dead, 2 open

5. Late July and August, Programme II

DateEventProduced
07-26Programme opens; Framework Alpha declaredEight-layer chain, budget of 12, eras sealed
07-27Substrate built: 12,970,563 rows, zero retries
07-27Proxy validated at five-minute resolution, capped at WEAK
07-28Crowding hypothesis falsified; skew sign opposite to prediction
07-28Four economic doors measured in one day
07-28Small-capital assessment issuedThe three-clause test
07-30Conditioned reversion closed on cost
07-30Branch closure retracted by its own authorsR-10, R-11
07-30Branch re-closed from four independent directions
07-30Stop overlay falsified; every level worse than no stopThe whipsaw anatomy
07-30Independent audit; six corrections mandatedVolatility figure 2.6 times too small; lift 1.52 corrected to 1.49
08-01Positioning drift falsified on the mirror test
08-01Spread census corrected from 7 instruments to 676Median 1.31 becomes 5.26
08-01Market making closed on adverse selection
08-01Execution cost: 15.02 measured against 5.50 requiredPatience is not a cost lever
08-02Sealed era opened onceResearch +8.24 against held-out -8.99
08-02Mechanism inversion recordedThe only such verdict in the archive
08-03Rebalance anchor found uncontrolled across 19 pre-registrationsR-09. BL-IN-006
08-03Momentum headline revised from 7.3 to about 4.5 percent annualised
08-03Carry closed at class level
08-03Knowledge map publishedBL-P2-003

6. September

DateEvent
09-07This record assembled from the archive

7. Three things the timeline shows

The measurement error sits at the centre. It was found on day 34 of roughly 90. Everything before it produced verdicts that had to be recomputed; everything after it produced verdicts that stood. A programme that had run the cost identity on day one would have compressed the first third substantially, and that is the largest single efficiency available to anyone repeating this work.

The apparatus was built in three weeks and paid for itself in five days. Every durable process artifact was written between 06-15 and 07-06. In the stretch from 07-09 to 07-14, four hypotheses were resolved on a venue the programme had been working for under two weeks.

Retractions cluster around the strongest work. The three retracted or revised results, on 06-22, 07-30 and 08-03, all came out of periods when the programme was auditing itself hardest. A record with no retractions is not a record with no errors.


Copyright (c) 2026 Bijective Labs. All rights reserved.